Does anyone know why Labour MP for Brent Central, Dawn Butler would be asking the Secretary of State for Justice if he is bringing in legislation to further criminalise squatting?
SQUATTERS have occupied a house in Bristol in protest at its imminent sale.
The terraced house in West Grove, Montepelier, was due to be sold by owners Knightstone Housing Association at an auction tonight.
Police are currently outside the building, which now has protesters on the roof.
Ben Richie from the squatters group Bristol Housing Action Movement, which works with housing campaign group Acorn, said the squatters had moved in to the house, near the Star and Garter pub, late this afternoon.
He said: “It started a couple of hours ago, there’s 2-3 people in the building.
“We’re concerned over the auction tonight. It’s a Knightstone Housing Association property and were concerned about the loss of social housing in the city.”
The protesters have told police they are staging a political occupation against the city council for auctioning off housing stock.
Mr Richie said: “We believe the council has offered a one-to-one swap of a property (to Knightstone), meaning the loss of one council house.
“By occupying it were hoping it can’t be auctioned off and therefore stopping privatisation through the back door. This is an area which is much sort after area.
Neighbour Sarah Jamieson said the house had been used for social housing for “20-odd years” but had been empty for more than a year since the previous tenant died.
Ms Jamieson said: “I’m overjoyed, because I know they’ve been selling houses off.
“The social housing around this area is diminishing.
“I was angry when I heard it was being sold off. Fiona, who lived there, would have been so upset.
“It was a family home and it should stay that way.”
The house was due to go under the hammer this evening, in a sale organised by Auction House Bristol & Somerset North at Ashton Gate stadium.
The three-storey Victorian mid-terrace house had a guide price of £250,000 to £300,000.
Described as “flexible accommodation” which could be used as a three or four-bedroom home and is in need of modernisation, the auctioneers said: “The property is situated in popular Montpelier, with its range of cafes bars and restaurants situated throughout the area, including Picton Street and Stokes Croft.”
UPDATE 9.20PM: Police went into the house to remove those inside but were unable to reach two squatters on the roof. Officers remain at the scene.http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/watch-squatters-occupy-bristol-home-in-protest-at-social-housing-sell-off/story-29513868-detail/story.html
the ASS email appears not be sending properly, especially with attachments
so if you were expecting a response from us and don’t get one, give us a call
we do normally reply
Avonmouth Squatting Victory
On 20th April 2016 a group of campaigners squatted a council house in Avonmouth to stop it being sold.
Six dramatic weeks later the squatters left, having successfully stopped the sale.
In March 2016 the then Mayor of Bristol, George Ferguson, announced 15 empty council residential properties were to be sold at auction. Ferguson said the money raised would be invested in current council stock and 75 council homes then under construction.
The sale of council houses while homelessness in Bristol is at crisis point was controversial. With a mayoral election on 5 May 2016 and all the other candidates opposing the sale there was also a question of democratic accountability.
On 20th April – the day of the auction – 44 Richmond Terrace in Avonmouth was squatted to try and prevent it being sold.
It was auctioned anyway and the buyer was not told the Council did not have vacant possession.
The Council now had 28 days to gain possession of the house and complete the sale. They asked the police to evict the squatters. The police refused as the occupiers were not living in the building and were therefore not breaking any laws.
The Council then did nothing, unable to make any decisions until after the mayoral election on 5th May. This was won by the Labour candidate, Marvin Rees, who had pledged to review council house sales.
After the election the Council again asked the police to evict the squatters. The police again refused.
The Council then issued a claim for possession in the County Court, with the hearing on 25th May. At the hearing the Council was awarded full possession entitling them to evict the occupiers. Unusually the court order specified the eviction had to happen before midnight on 1st June.
The Council attempted to evict at 5.30am on Tuesday, 31st May. However they had completely underestimated the occupiers who had heavily barricaded the building and built a roof platform. It would take a substantial team of qualified and properly equipped climbing bailiffs to evict the squatters. The Council attended with about four contractors, a County Court bailiff and a council officer.
After causing minor damage to the front door and waking the whole neighbourhood up with pointless banging the Council gave up on the eviction attempt.
Meanwhile the squatters were in contact with the buyer who now wanted to withdraw from the sale. She’d found out the property required about £30,000 of repairs that the Council do not appear to have fully disclosed. Her solicitor had served a notice to complete the sale on the Council, expiring on 7th June (or thereabouts). After that the sale has failed and the Council has to return her deposit and pay compensation.
On 1st June the Council’s court order timed out. They met with the buyer and agreed to release her from the contract. The sale had now failed.
With the house no longer being sold and a new Mayor opposed to further council house sales the occupiers handed possession back to the Council on Monday, 6th June.
Friday 10th June Freedom building monthly social from 6pm until 9.
(then later there’s an Oi Poloi benefit for continuing the beach trespass they did recently at T Chances, not that anyone else needs to raise money to party on the beach!)
Saturday 11th June Towpath Gathering – annual boaters fest on the canal by the Canal Gate, Victoria Park from 12
Saturday 11th June 2-4 Squatting in the Netherlands: Talk by ETC Dee at Decentre (downstairs from ASS)
Tuesday 14th June 8.30am Protest at the London Real Estate Forum 2016, Berkeley Sq W1
Saturday 18th June National Protest against the Housing and Planning Act, gather 12 at Hyde Pk Corner.
Didn’t they learn anything from the attempted eviction of Can Vies two years ago, and the popular response that ensued? Have they not yet understood that when you attack the autonomous fabric of a neighbourhood in a city like Barcelona, it will cause the underlying the social, political and economic contradictions to erupt?
Jack Tafari, homeless activist has died
The link between rising homelessness and the criminalisation of squatting – May 2016
Squatters Action for Secure Homes (SQUASH) has been tracking implementation of section 144 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (s144 LASPOA) since it came into effect in September 2012. Section 144 criminalises squatting in empty residential properties, gives the police new powers, and guilt is determined by a lay magistrate, rather than a trained judge. Since 2012, there have been at least 738 arrests, 326 prosecutions and over 60 convictions for the offence. The consequence of the new law, are now starting to be felt.
In The City: Mod & Ska 100%Vinyl
Friday 13th May 8pm – 1am
Night of Mod: 60’s R&B, Motown, Northern Soul, Jamaican Ska, Calypso & Rocksteady.
DJ’s: Lou Pino & DJ Lee (Resident DJ @ITC).
Benefit for Advisory Service for Squatters
Upstairs at T. Chances Venue, 399 High Road, London, N17 6QN.
Nearest Tube – Seven Sisters. Buses 41, 123, 149, 243, 279, 254, 476. N41, N73, N76, N279.
People might think something needs to be done about Shoreditch, but on the 3rd March an Interim Possession Order was granted on the whole of the Bishopsgate Goodsyard, including Shoreditch High Street station, the football pitches, the car wash and the “boxpark” shops.
Anyone in occupation at the time that the order was served should have left the land, and anyone using the station or the football pitches, or entering the shops could have been liable for arrest if accused of, or considered by police to be trespassing. How would they tell?
There was meant to be a follow-up hearing on the 10th at which the IPO might have come to an end, and at which a full possession order might have been made, giving Network Rail the right to bring in bailiffs to remove everyone from the land. That would be interesting.
The IPO was made by Mrs Justice Asplin DBE in the High Court, having agreed that service of the claim and application be reduced to 5 hours and 45 minutes. The claim doesn’t seem to have been served on all of the land covered by the order. A Guy Thornet for Network Rail had signed a statement that there was nobody else with any right to occupy the land, ignoring the thousands of people with a licence or tenancy to be on the land. This could be considered by some to be a criminal contravention of s75 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 as well as contempt of court.
The IPO itself was obviously not served on the whole of the land claimed, but was found on a mainly unused gate round the back. It was not in the correct format, but was cobbled together by Network Rail, and did not make clear what land was covered. So, all in all it would be pretty easy to argue against arrest and/or conviction, but it is concerning that an order was made that so clearly included land that wasn’t served and whose occupiers had every right to be there.